2013 Foundations

Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey

Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac

Public Money & Management

Open access

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 6
References in snapshot: 0
Global cited by: 93

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 6

Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020
Negative media reporting and its effects on performance information use in public spending David Lindermüller, Matthias Sohn, Bernhard Hirsch · 2021
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

References 0

No outgoing reference to another provisional record in this snapshot.

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

14 shared references · rank 1 of 64

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.225
Jaccard
0.117
Selected rank
1 of 64
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

13 shared references · rank 2 of 64

Shared references
13
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.207
Jaccard
0.106
Selected rank
2 of 64
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

12 shared references · rank 3 of 64

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.230
Jaccard
0.126
Selected rank
3 of 64
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

11 shared references · rank 4 of 64

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.231
Jaccard
0.129
Selected rank
4 of 64
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

11 shared references · rank 5 of 64

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.183
Jaccard
0.094
Selected rank
5 of 64
Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016

11 shared references · rank 6 of 64

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
88
Cosine
0.181
Jaccard
0.092
Selected rank
6 of 64
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

10 shared references · rank 7 of 64

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.156
Jaccard
0.077
Selected rank
7 of 64
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

10 shared references · rank 8 of 64

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.151
Jaccard
0.074
Selected rank
8 of 64
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

8 shared references · rank 9 of 64

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.166
Jaccard
0.090
Selected rank
9 of 64
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

8 shared references · rank 10 of 64

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.144
Jaccard
0.075
Selected rank
10 of 64
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

8 shared references · rank 11 of 64

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.143
Jaccard
0.074
Selected rank
11 of 64
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

7 shared references · rank 12 of 64

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.151
Jaccard
0.081
Selected rank
12 of 64
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

7 shared references · rank 13 of 64

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.118
Jaccard
0.059
Selected rank
13 of 64
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

6 shared references · rank 14 of 64

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.161
Jaccard
0.087
Selected rank
14 of 64
What Can Performance Information Do to Legislators? A Budget‐Decision Experiment with Legislators Labinot Demaj · 2017

6 shared references · rank 15 of 64

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.120
Jaccard
0.063
Selected rank
15 of 64
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

6 shared references · rank 16 of 64

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.100
Jaccard
0.049
Selected rank
16 of 64
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

5 shared references · rank 17 of 64

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.098
Jaccard
0.051
Selected rank
17 of 64
Negative media reporting and its effects on performance information use in public spending David Lindermüller, Matthias Sohn, Bernhard Hirsch · 2021

5 shared references · rank 18 of 64

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
77
Cosine
0.088
Jaccard
0.044
Selected rank
18 of 64
Performance Information Use in Local Government: Monitoring Relationships with Emergency Medical Services Agencies Alexander C. Henderson, Daniel E. Bromberg · 2015

4 shared references · rank 19 of 64

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
38
Cosine
0.100
Jaccard
0.053
Selected rank
19 of 64
DOES PERFORMANCE INFORMATION ABOUT PUBLIC SERVICES AFFECT CITIZENS' PERCEPTIONS, SATISFACTION, AND VOICE BEHAVIOUR? FIELD EXPERIMENTS WITH ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Oliver James, Alice Moseley · 2014

4 shared references · rank 20 of 64

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
42
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.080
Jaccard
0.041
Selected rank
20 of 64

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

4 shared citing records · rank 1 of 5

Shared citing records
4
This record citer degree
6
Neighbor citer degree
5
Cosine
0.730
Jaccard
0.571
Selected rank
1 of 5
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

4 shared citing records · rank 2 of 5

Shared citing records
4
This record citer degree
6
Neighbor citer degree
16
Cosine
0.408
Jaccard
0.222
Selected rank
2 of 5
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

3 shared citing records · rank 3 of 5

Shared citing records
3
This record citer degree
6
Neighbor citer degree
10
Cosine
0.387
Jaccard
0.231
Selected rank
3 of 5
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

2 shared citing records · rank 4 of 5

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
6
Neighbor citer degree
3
Cosine
0.471
Jaccard
0.286
Selected rank
4 of 5
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

2 shared citing records · rank 5 of 5

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
6
Neighbor citer degree
4
Cosine
0.408
Jaccard
0.250
Selected rank
5 of 5

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.