2015 Foundations

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research

Alexander Kroll

Public Performance & Management Review

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 16
References in snapshot: 1
Global cited by: 293

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 16

Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016
How is the Use of Performance Information Related to Performance of Public Sector Professionals? Evidence from the Field of Academic Research Rick Vogel, Fabian Hattke · 2018
Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use Jakob Majlund Holm · 2017
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

Show 8 more citing records

Performance information and learning effects on citizen satisfaction with public services Yu Noda · 2020
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020
The Use of Performance Information under Conflict: A Large-N Study Peter Dahler‐Larsen · 2021
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022
How Do Public Managers Learn from Performance Information? Experimental Evidence on Problem Focus, Innovative Search, and Change Jesper Asring Jessen Hansen, Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2022
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

References 1

Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

42 shared references · rank 1 of 40

Shared references
42
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.442
Jaccard
0.284
Selected rank
1 of 40
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

29 shared references · rank 2 of 40

Shared references
29
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.296
Jaccard
0.174
Selected rank
2 of 40
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

28 shared references · rank 3 of 40

Shared references
28
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.315
Jaccard
0.187
Selected rank
3 of 40
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

22 shared references · rank 4 of 40

Shared references
22
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.250
Jaccard
0.143
Selected rank
4 of 40
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

20 shared references · rank 5 of 40

Shared references
20
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.242
Jaccard
0.137
Selected rank
5 of 40
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

18 shared references · rank 6 of 40

Shared references
18
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.220
Jaccard
0.122
Selected rank
6 of 40
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

16 shared references · rank 7 of 40

Shared references
16
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.207
Jaccard
0.113
Selected rank
7 of 40
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

14 shared references · rank 8 of 40

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.225
Jaccard
0.117
Selected rank
8 of 40
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

14 shared references · rank 9 of 40

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.204
Jaccard
0.109
Selected rank
9 of 40
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

14 shared references · rank 10 of 40

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.185
Jaccard
0.100
Selected rank
10 of 40
Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016

14 shared references · rank 11 of 40

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
88
Cosine
0.156
Jaccard
0.084
Selected rank
11 of 40
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

13 shared references · rank 12 of 40

Shared references
13
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.236
Jaccard
0.116
Selected rank
12 of 40
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

12 shared references · rank 13 of 40

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.135
Jaccard
0.072
Selected rank
13 of 40
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

11 shared references · rank 14 of 40

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.155
Jaccard
0.081
Selected rank
14 of 40
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

11 shared references · rank 15 of 40

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.118
Jaccard
0.063
Selected rank
15 of 40
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

10 shared references · rank 16 of 40

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.141
Jaccard
0.073
Selected rank
16 of 40
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019

9 shared references · rank 17 of 40

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
78
Cosine
0.106
Jaccard
0.056
Selected rank
17 of 40
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

8 shared references · rank 18 of 40

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.114
Jaccard
0.058
Selected rank
18 of 40
Uncovering the Circumstances of Performance Information Use Findings from an Experiment Donald P. Moynihan · 2015

7 shared references · rank 19 of 40

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
43
Cosine
0.111
Jaccard
0.055
Selected rank
19 of 40
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020

7 shared references · rank 20 of 40

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
92
Neighbor reference degree
50
Cosine
0.103
Jaccard
0.052
Selected rank
20 of 40

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

6 shared citing records · rank 1 of 16

Shared citing records
6
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
10
Cosine
0.474
Jaccard
0.300
Selected rank
1 of 16
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

4 shared citing records · rank 2 of 16

Shared citing records
4
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
4
Cosine
0.500
Jaccard
0.250
Selected rank
2 of 16
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

4 shared citing records · rank 3 of 16

Shared citing records
4
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
6
Cosine
0.408
Jaccard
0.222
Selected rank
3 of 16
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

4 shared citing records · rank 4 of 16

Shared citing records
4
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
23
Cosine
0.209
Jaccard
0.114
Selected rank
4 of 16
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

3 shared citing records · rank 5 of 16

Shared citing records
3
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
3
Cosine
0.433
Jaccard
0.188
Selected rank
5 of 16
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

3 shared citing records · rank 6 of 16

Shared citing records
3
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
3
Cosine
0.433
Jaccard
0.188
Selected rank
6 of 16
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

3 shared citing records · rank 7 of 16

Shared citing records
3
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
3
Cosine
0.433
Jaccard
0.188
Selected rank
7 of 16
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

3 shared citing records · rank 8 of 16

Shared citing records
3
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
5
Cosine
0.335
Jaccard
0.167
Selected rank
8 of 16
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

3 shared citing records · rank 9 of 16

Shared citing records
3
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
18
Cosine
0.177
Jaccard
0.097
Selected rank
9 of 16
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

2 shared citing records · rank 10 of 16

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
2
Cosine
0.354
Jaccard
0.125
Selected rank
10 of 16
Uncovering the Circumstances of Performance Information Use Findings from an Experiment Donald P. Moynihan · 2015

2 shared citing records · rank 11 of 16

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
3
Cosine
0.289
Jaccard
0.118
Selected rank
11 of 16
Performance Gaps and Managerial Decisions: A Bayesian Decision Theory of Managerial Action Kenneth J. Meier, Nathan Favero, Ling Zhu · 2015

2 shared citing records · rank 12 of 16

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
17
Cosine
0.121
Jaccard
0.065
Selected rank
12 of 16
A Behavioral Model of Innovative Search: Evidence from Public Hospital Services Torsten Oliver Salge · 2010

2 shared citing records · rank 13 of 16

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
28
Cosine
0.094
Jaccard
0.048
Selected rank
13 of 16
Organizational Aspirations, Reference Points, and Goals George A. Shinkle · 2011

2 shared citing records · rank 14 of 16

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
89
Cosine
0.053
Jaccard
0.019
Selected rank
14 of 16
A Behavioral Theory of Firm Growth: Sequential Attention to Size and Performance Goals Henrich R. Greve · 2008

2 shared citing records · rank 15 of 16

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
119
Cosine
0.046
Jaccard
0.015
Selected rank
15 of 16
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm William J. Baumöl, Richard M. Cyert, J. G. March · 1964

2 shared citing records · rank 16 of 16

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
16
Neighbor citer degree
140
Cosine
0.042
Jaccard
0.013
Selected rank
16 of 16

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.