2019 Foundations

Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment

Andrew Ballard

Public Performance & Management Review

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 0
References in snapshot: 4
Global cited by: 28

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 0

No incoming citation from another provisional record in this snapshot.

References 4

Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015
Uncovering the Circumstances of Performance Information Use Findings from an Experiment Donald P. Moynihan · 2015
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

9 shared references · rank 1 of 31

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.106
Jaccard
0.056
Selected rank
1 of 31
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

9 shared references · rank 2 of 31

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.105
Jaccard
0.055
Selected rank
2 of 31
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

9 shared references · rank 3 of 31

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.100
Jaccard
0.052
Selected rank
3 of 31
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

7 shared references · rank 4 of 31

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.093
Jaccard
0.049
Selected rank
4 of 31
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

6 shared references · rank 5 of 31

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.084
Jaccard
0.044
Selected rank
5 of 31
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

6 shared references · rank 6 of 31

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.079
Jaccard
0.041
Selected rank
6 of 31
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

6 shared references · rank 7 of 31

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.069
Jaccard
0.035
Selected rank
7 of 31
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

5 shared references · rank 8 of 31

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.076
Jaccard
0.039
Selected rank
8 of 31
Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use Jakob Majlund Holm · 2017

5 shared references · rank 9 of 31

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.073
Jaccard
0.038
Selected rank
9 of 31
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

5 shared references · rank 10 of 31

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.072
Jaccard
0.037
Selected rank
10 of 31
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

5 shared references · rank 11 of 31

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.062
Jaccard
0.032
Selected rank
11 of 31
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

5 shared references · rank 12 of 31

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.061
Jaccard
0.031
Selected rank
12 of 31
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

5 shared references · rank 13 of 31

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.061
Jaccard
0.031
Selected rank
13 of 31
The Use of Performance Information under Conflict: A Large-N Study Peter Dahler‐Larsen · 2021

4 shared references · rank 14 of 31

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
36
Cosine
0.075
Jaccard
0.036
Selected rank
14 of 31
Uncovering the Circumstances of Performance Information Use Findings from an Experiment Donald P. Moynihan · 2015

4 shared references · rank 15 of 31

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
43
Cosine
0.069
Jaccard
0.034
Selected rank
15 of 31
The Impact of Active Engagement With Performance Information on Citizens Views on Public Services: A Budget Game Experiment Erasmus Häggblom, Bjorn Kleizen, Wouter Van Dooren · 2026

4 shared references · rank 16 of 31

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
45
Cosine
0.068
Jaccard
0.034
Selected rank
16 of 31
The relevance and reliability of performance information for accountability: A survey experiment exploring citizens' views Shlomo Mizrahi, Yizhaq Minchuk · 2020

4 shared references · rank 17 of 31

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
50
Cosine
0.064
Jaccard
0.032
Selected rank
17 of 31
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020

4 shared references · rank 18 of 31

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
50
Cosine
0.064
Jaccard
0.032
Selected rank
18 of 31
Performance information and learning effects on citizen satisfaction with public services Yu Noda · 2020

4 shared references · rank 19 of 31

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.062
Jaccard
0.031
Selected rank
19 of 31
Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016

4 shared references · rank 20 of 31

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
78
Neighbor reference degree
88
Cosine
0.048
Jaccard
0.025
Selected rank
20 of 31

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

No exported neighbor met this bounded co-citation selection.

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.