2020 Foundations

Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ?

Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer

Public Performance & Management Review

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 2
References in snapshot: 5
Global cited by: 24

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 2

Performance feedback in healthcare organizations: The role of accountability measures and competition Sounman Hong et al. · 2024
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

References 5

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

13 shared references · rank 1 of 29

Shared references
13
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.214
Jaccard
0.117
Selected rank
1 of 29
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

11 shared references · rank 2 of 29

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.182
Jaccard
0.098
Selected rank
2 of 29
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

8 shared references · rank 3 of 29

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.144
Jaccard
0.077
Selected rank
3 of 29
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

7 shared references · rank 4 of 29

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.103
Jaccard
0.052
Selected rank
4 of 29
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

7 shared references · rank 5 of 29

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.097
Jaccard
0.048
Selected rank
5 of 29
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

6 shared references · rank 6 of 29

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.105
Jaccard
0.055
Selected rank
6 of 29
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

6 shared references · rank 7 of 29

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.086
Jaccard
0.042
Selected rank
7 of 29
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

5 shared references · rank 8 of 29

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.077
Jaccard
0.039
Selected rank
8 of 29
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

4 shared references · rank 9 of 29

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.079
Jaccard
0.041
Selected rank
9 of 29
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019

4 shared references · rank 10 of 29

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
78
Cosine
0.064
Jaccard
0.032
Selected rank
10 of 29
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

4 shared references · rank 11 of 29

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.061
Jaccard
0.030
Selected rank
11 of 29
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

4 shared references · rank 12 of 29

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.061
Jaccard
0.030
Selected rank
12 of 29
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

3 shared references · rank 13 of 29

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.074
Jaccard
0.037
Selected rank
13 of 29
Performance Information Use in Local Government: Monitoring Relationships with Emergency Medical Services Agencies Alexander C. Henderson, Daniel E. Bromberg · 2015

3 shared references · rank 14 of 29

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
38
Cosine
0.069
Jaccard
0.035
Selected rank
14 of 29
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

3 shared references · rank 15 of 29

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.065
Jaccard
0.034
Selected rank
15 of 29
Performance feedback in healthcare organizations: The role of accountability measures and competition Sounman Hong et al. · 2024

3 shared references · rank 16 of 29

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.057
Jaccard
0.029
Selected rank
16 of 29
Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use Jakob Majlund Holm · 2017

3 shared references · rank 17 of 29

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.055
Jaccard
0.028
Selected rank
17 of 29
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

3 shared references · rank 18 of 29

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.044
Jaccard
0.021
Selected rank
18 of 29
The Use of Performance Information under Conflict: A Large-N Study Peter Dahler‐Larsen · 2021

2 shared references · rank 19 of 29

Shared references
2
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
36
Cosine
0.047
Jaccard
0.024
Selected rank
19 of 29
Public Sector Organizations' Use of Benchmarking Information for Performance Improvement: Theoretical Analysis and Explorative Case Studies in Dutch Water Boards Sandra Tillema · 2007

2 shared references · rank 20 of 29

Shared references
2
This record reference degree
50
Neighbor reference degree
37
Cosine
0.046
Jaccard
0.024
Selected rank
20 of 29

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

No exported neighbor met this bounded co-citation selection.

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.