2022 Foundations

Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective

Yujin Choi, Harin Woo

Public Management Review

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 1
References in snapshot: 8
Global cited by: 34

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 1

Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

References 8

LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

25 shared references · rank 1 of 75

Shared references
25
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.304
Jaccard
0.174
Selected rank
1 of 75
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

19 shared references · rank 2 of 75

Shared references
19
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.243
Jaccard
0.136
Selected rank
2 of 75
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

16 shared references · rank 3 of 75

Shared references
16
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.207
Jaccard
0.113
Selected rank
3 of 75
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

15 shared references · rank 4 of 75

Shared references
15
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.188
Jaccard
0.101
Selected rank
4 of 75
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

14 shared references · rank 5 of 75

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.189
Jaccard
0.104
Selected rank
5 of 75
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

12 shared references · rank 6 of 75

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.230
Jaccard
0.126
Selected rank
6 of 75
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

12 shared references · rank 7 of 75

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.174
Jaccard
0.095
Selected rank
7 of 75
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

10 shared references · rank 8 of 75

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.167
Jaccard
0.091
Selected rank
8 of 75
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

10 shared references · rank 9 of 75

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.144
Jaccard
0.078
Selected rank
9 of 75
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

9 shared references · rank 10 of 75

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.142
Jaccard
0.076
Selected rank
10 of 75
Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016

9 shared references · rank 11 of 75

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
88
Cosine
0.119
Jaccard
0.063
Selected rank
11 of 75
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

8 shared references · rank 12 of 75

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.173
Jaccard
0.089
Selected rank
12 of 75
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

8 shared references · rank 13 of 75

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.134
Jaccard
0.071
Selected rank
13 of 75
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

8 shared references · rank 14 of 75

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.107
Jaccard
0.056
Selected rank
14 of 75
The Use of Performance Information under Conflict: A Large-N Study Peter Dahler‐Larsen · 2021

7 shared references · rank 15 of 75

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
36
Cosine
0.145
Jaccard
0.074
Selected rank
15 of 75
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

7 shared references · rank 16 of 75

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.122
Jaccard
0.064
Selected rank
16 of 75
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

7 shared references · rank 17 of 75

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.118
Jaccard
0.063
Selected rank
17 of 75
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

7 shared references · rank 18 of 75

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.094
Jaccard
0.049
Selected rank
18 of 75
Manager and employee behaviors in response to performance signals in public organizations Taek Kyu Kim · 2023

7 shared references · rank 19 of 75

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
201
Cosine
0.061
Jaccard
0.027
Selected rank
19 of 75
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020

6 shared references · rank 20 of 75

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
65
Neighbor reference degree
50
Cosine
0.105
Jaccard
0.055
Selected rank
20 of 75

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

No exported neighbor met this bounded co-citation selection.

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.