2014 Foundations

Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations

Alexander Kroll

International Public Management Journal

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 5
References in snapshot: 1
Global cited by: 61

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 5

Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020
Negative media reporting and its effects on performance information use in public spending David Lindermüller, Matthias Sohn, Bernhard Hirsch · 2021
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

References 1

Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

42 shared references · rank 1 of 41

Shared references
42
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.442
Jaccard
0.284
Selected rank
1 of 41
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

24 shared references · rank 2 of 41

Shared references
24
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.238
Jaccard
0.135
Selected rank
2 of 41
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

22 shared references · rank 3 of 41

Shared references
22
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.240
Jaccard
0.136
Selected rank
3 of 41
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

20 shared references · rank 4 of 41

Shared references
20
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.235
Jaccard
0.132
Selected rank
4 of 41
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

16 shared references · rank 5 of 41

Shared references
16
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.205
Jaccard
0.111
Selected rank
5 of 41
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

16 shared references · rank 6 of 41

Shared references
16
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.176
Jaccard
0.096
Selected rank
6 of 41
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

15 shared references · rank 7 of 41

Shared references
15
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.188
Jaccard
0.101
Selected rank
7 of 41
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

14 shared references · rank 8 of 41

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.246
Jaccard
0.120
Selected rank
8 of 41
Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016

14 shared references · rank 9 of 41

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
88
Cosine
0.151
Jaccard
0.081
Selected rank
9 of 41
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

12 shared references · rank 10 of 41

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.170
Jaccard
0.088
Selected rank
10 of 41
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

12 shared references · rank 11 of 41

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.142
Jaccard
0.075
Selected rank
11 of 41
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

10 shared references · rank 12 of 41

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.156
Jaccard
0.077
Selected rank
12 of 41
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

9 shared references · rank 13 of 41

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.123
Jaccard
0.063
Selected rank
13 of 41
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

9 shared references · rank 14 of 41

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.094
Jaccard
0.049
Selected rank
14 of 41
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

8 shared references · rank 15 of 41

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.109
Jaccard
0.055
Selected rank
15 of 41
Performance Information Use in Local Government: Monitoring Relationships with Emergency Medical Services Agencies Alexander C. Henderson, Daniel E. Bromberg · 2015

7 shared references · rank 16 of 41

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
38
Cosine
0.115
Jaccard
0.054
Selected rank
16 of 41
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

7 shared references · rank 17 of 41

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.076
Jaccard
0.040
Selected rank
17 of 41
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020

6 shared references · rank 18 of 41

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
50
Cosine
0.086
Jaccard
0.042
Selected rank
18 of 41
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019

6 shared references · rank 19 of 41

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
78
Cosine
0.069
Jaccard
0.035
Selected rank
19 of 41
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

5 shared references · rank 20 of 41

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
98
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.069
Jaccard
0.034
Selected rank
20 of 41

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

4 shared citing records · rank 1 of 3

Shared citing records
4
This record citer degree
5
Neighbor citer degree
6
Cosine
0.730
Jaccard
0.571
Selected rank
1 of 3
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

3 shared citing records · rank 2 of 3

Shared citing records
3
This record citer degree
5
Neighbor citer degree
16
Cosine
0.335
Jaccard
0.167
Selected rank
2 of 3
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

2 shared citing records · rank 3 of 3

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
5
Neighbor citer degree
10
Cosine
0.283
Jaccard
0.154
Selected rank
3 of 3

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.