2015 Foundations

Uncovering the Circumstances of Performance Information Use Findings from an Experiment

Donald P. Moynihan

Public Performance & Management Review

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 3
References in snapshot: 1
Global cited by: 49

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 3

Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019
What Can Performance Information Do to Legislators? A Budget‐Decision Experiment with Legislators Labinot Demaj · 2017

References 1

Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

7 shared references · rank 1 of 37

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.111
Jaccard
0.055
Selected rank
1 of 37
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

6 shared references · rank 2 of 37

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.159
Jaccard
0.086
Selected rank
2 of 37
Negative media reporting and its effects on performance information use in public spending David Lindermüller, Matthias Sohn, Bernhard Hirsch · 2021

6 shared references · rank 3 of 37

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
77
Cosine
0.104
Jaccard
0.053
Selected rank
3 of 37
Performance information and learning effects on citizen satisfaction with public services Yu Noda · 2020

5 shared references · rank 4 of 37

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.104
Jaccard
0.054
Selected rank
4 of 37
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

5 shared references · rank 5 of 37

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.082
Jaccard
0.040
Selected rank
5 of 37
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

5 shared references · rank 6 of 37

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.075
Jaccard
0.035
Selected rank
6 of 37
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

4 shared references · rank 7 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.085
Jaccard
0.044
Selected rank
7 of 37
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

4 shared references · rank 8 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.082
Jaccard
0.043
Selected rank
8 of 37
Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use Jakob Majlund Holm · 2017

4 shared references · rank 9 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.079
Jaccard
0.040
Selected rank
9 of 37
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

4 shared references · rank 10 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.076
Jaccard
0.038
Selected rank
10 of 37
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

4 shared references · rank 11 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.071
Jaccard
0.035
Selected rank
11 of 37
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019

4 shared references · rank 12 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
78
Cosine
0.069
Jaccard
0.034
Selected rank
12 of 37
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

4 shared references · rank 13 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.067
Jaccard
0.033
Selected rank
13 of 37
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

4 shared references · rank 14 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.062
Jaccard
0.029
Selected rank
14 of 37
Microfoundations of Organizational Goals: A Review and New Directions for Future Research Stefan Linder, Nicolai J. Foss · 2018

4 shared references · rank 15 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
163
Cosine
0.048
Jaccard
0.020
Selected rank
15 of 37
Manager and employee behaviors in response to performance signals in public organizations Taek Kyu Kim · 2023

4 shared references · rank 16 of 37

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
201
Cosine
0.043
Jaccard
0.017
Selected rank
16 of 37
Reporting multiple dimensions of public service performance: information order effects on citizens’ willingness to use services Julian Christensen, Oliver James · 2020

3 shared references · rank 17 of 37

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.064
Jaccard
0.033
Selected rank
17 of 37
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

3 shared references · rank 18 of 37

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.062
Jaccard
0.032
Selected rank
18 of 37
What Can Performance Information Do to Legislators? A Budget‐Decision Experiment with Legislators Labinot Demaj · 2017

3 shared references · rank 19 of 37

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.059
Jaccard
0.030
Selected rank
19 of 37
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

3 shared references · rank 20 of 37

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
43
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.054
Jaccard
0.027
Selected rank
20 of 37

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

2 shared citing records · rank 1 of 1

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
3
Neighbor citer degree
16
Cosine
0.289
Jaccard
0.118
Selected rank
1 of 1

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.