2016 Foundations

Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities

Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero

Public Performance & Management Review

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 0
References in snapshot: 2
Global cited by: 99

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 0

No incoming citation from another provisional record in this snapshot.

References 2

Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

14 shared references · rank 1 of 63

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.156
Jaccard
0.084
Selected rank
1 of 63
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

14 shared references · rank 2 of 63

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.151
Jaccard
0.081
Selected rank
2 of 63
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

13 shared references · rank 3 of 63

Shared references
13
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.149
Jaccard
0.081
Selected rank
3 of 63
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

11 shared references · rank 4 of 63

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.181
Jaccard
0.092
Selected rank
4 of 63
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

11 shared references · rank 5 of 63

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.158
Jaccard
0.083
Selected rank
5 of 63
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

11 shared references · rank 6 of 63

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.115
Jaccard
0.061
Selected rank
6 of 63
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

10 shared references · rank 7 of 63

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.145
Jaccard
0.076
Selected rank
7 of 63
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

10 shared references · rank 8 of 63

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.110
Jaccard
0.058
Selected rank
8 of 63
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

9 shared references · rank 9 of 63

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.119
Jaccard
0.063
Selected rank
9 of 63
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

8 shared references · rank 10 of 63

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.099
Jaccard
0.052
Selected rank
10 of 63
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

7 shared references · rank 11 of 63

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.087
Jaccard
0.045
Selected rank
11 of 63
What Can Performance Information Do to Legislators? A Budget‐Decision Experiment with Legislators Labinot Demaj · 2017

6 shared references · rank 12 of 63

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.083
Jaccard
0.042
Selected rank
12 of 63
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

6 shared references · rank 13 of 63

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.081
Jaccard
0.042
Selected rank
13 of 63
Negative media reporting and its effects on performance information use in public spending David Lindermüller, Matthias Sohn, Bernhard Hirsch · 2021

6 shared references · rank 14 of 63

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
77
Cosine
0.073
Jaccard
0.038
Selected rank
14 of 63
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

5 shared references · rank 15 of 63

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.093
Jaccard
0.043
Selected rank
15 of 63
Performance Information Use in Local Government: Monitoring Relationships with Emergency Medical Services Agencies Alexander C. Henderson, Daniel E. Bromberg · 2015

5 shared references · rank 16 of 63

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
38
Cosine
0.086
Jaccard
0.041
Selected rank
16 of 63
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

5 shared references · rank 17 of 63

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.072
Jaccard
0.036
Selected rank
17 of 63
Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use Jakob Majlund Holm · 2017

5 shared references · rank 18 of 63

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.069
Jaccard
0.035
Selected rank
18 of 63
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

5 shared references · rank 19 of 63

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.058
Jaccard
0.030
Selected rank
19 of 63
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

4 shared references · rank 20 of 63

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
88
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.060
Jaccard
0.030
Selected rank
20 of 63

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

No exported neighbor met this bounded co-citation selection.

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.