2016 Foundations

Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information?

Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo

Public Performance & Management Review

Open access

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 1
References in snapshot: 3
Global cited by: 15

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 1

How is the Use of Performance Information Related to Performance of Public Sector Professionals? Evidence from the Field of Academic Research Rick Vogel, Fabian Hattke · 2018

References 3

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013
Uncovering the Circumstances of Performance Information Use Findings from an Experiment Donald P. Moynihan · 2015

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016

11 shared references · rank 1 of 28

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
88
Cosine
0.158
Jaccard
0.083
Selected rank
1 of 28
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

11 shared references · rank 2 of 28

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.155
Jaccard
0.081
Selected rank
2 of 28
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

10 shared references · rank 3 of 28

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.167
Jaccard
0.091
Selected rank
3 of 28
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

9 shared references · rank 4 of 28

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.125
Jaccard
0.064
Selected rank
4 of 28
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

9 shared references · rank 5 of 28

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.123
Jaccard
0.063
Selected rank
5 of 28
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

8 shared references · rank 6 of 28

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.166
Jaccard
0.090
Selected rank
6 of 28
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

8 shared references · rank 7 of 28

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.116
Jaccard
0.060
Selected rank
7 of 28
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

7 shared references · rank 8 of 28

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.110
Jaccard
0.058
Selected rank
8 of 28
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

7 shared references · rank 9 of 28

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.093
Jaccard
0.046
Selected rank
9 of 28
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

6 shared references · rank 10 of 28

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.110
Jaccard
0.058
Selected rank
10 of 28
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

6 shared references · rank 11 of 28

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.103
Jaccard
0.054
Selected rank
11 of 28
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

6 shared references · rank 12 of 28

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.088
Jaccard
0.045
Selected rank
12 of 28
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019

5 shared references · rank 13 of 28

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
78
Cosine
0.076
Jaccard
0.039
Selected rank
13 of 28
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

4 shared references · rank 14 of 28

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.073
Jaccard
0.038
Selected rank
14 of 28
Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use Jakob Majlund Holm · 2017

4 shared references · rank 15 of 28

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.070
Jaccard
0.036
Selected rank
15 of 28
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

4 shared references · rank 16 of 28

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.063
Jaccard
0.032
Selected rank
16 of 28
How is the Use of Performance Information Related to Performance of Public Sector Professionals? Evidence from the Field of Academic Research Rick Vogel, Fabian Hattke · 2018

4 shared references · rank 17 of 28

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
106
Cosine
0.052
Jaccard
0.025
Selected rank
17 of 28
The Use of Performance Information under Conflict: A Large-N Study Peter Dahler‐Larsen · 2021

3 shared references · rank 18 of 28

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
36
Cosine
0.067
Jaccard
0.034
Selected rank
18 of 28
Performance Information Use in Local Government: Monitoring Relationships with Emergency Medical Services Agencies Alexander C. Henderson, Daniel E. Bromberg · 2015

3 shared references · rank 19 of 28

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
38
Cosine
0.066
Jaccard
0.033
Selected rank
19 of 28
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

3 shared references · rank 20 of 28

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
55
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.057
Jaccard
0.029
Selected rank
20 of 28

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

No exported neighbor met this bounded co-citation selection.

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.