2018 Foundations

How is the Use of Performance Information Related to Performance of Public Sector Professionals? Evidence from the Field of Academic Research

Rick Vogel, Fabian Hattke

Public Performance & Management Review

Open access

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 1
References in snapshot: 3
Global cited by: 35

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 1

The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

References 3

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

8 shared references · rank 1 of 27

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.085
Jaccard
0.044
Selected rank
1 of 27
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

7 shared references · rank 2 of 27

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.070
Jaccard
0.036
Selected rank
2 of 27
Literature Review Feifei Yang, Mirjam Goudsmit, George A. Shinkle · 2022

6 shared references · rank 3 of 27

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
257
Cosine
0.036
Jaccard
0.017
Selected rank
3 of 27
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

5 shared references · rank 4 of 27

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.060
Jaccard
0.030
Selected rank
4 of 27
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

5 shared references · rank 5 of 27

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.057
Jaccard
0.029
Selected rank
5 of 27
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

5 shared references · rank 6 of 27

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.056
Jaccard
0.029
Selected rank
6 of 27
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

5 shared references · rank 7 of 27

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.052
Jaccard
0.027
Selected rank
7 of 27
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

5 shared references · rank 8 of 27

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.048
Jaccard
0.024
Selected rank
8 of 27
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

4 shared references · rank 9 of 27

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.053
Jaccard
0.026
Selected rank
9 of 27
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

4 shared references · rank 10 of 27

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.052
Jaccard
0.025
Selected rank
10 of 27
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019

4 shared references · rank 11 of 27

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
78
Cosine
0.044
Jaccard
0.022
Selected rank
11 of 27
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

4 shared references · rank 12 of 27

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.039
Jaccard
0.020
Selected rank
12 of 27
The Use of Performance Information under Conflict: A Large-N Study Peter Dahler‐Larsen · 2021

3 shared references · rank 13 of 27

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
36
Cosine
0.049
Jaccard
0.022
Selected rank
13 of 27
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

3 shared references · rank 14 of 27

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.045
Jaccard
0.021
Selected rank
14 of 27
Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use Jakob Majlund Holm · 2017

3 shared references · rank 15 of 27

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.038
Jaccard
0.018
Selected rank
15 of 27
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

3 shared references · rank 16 of 27

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.037
Jaccard
0.018
Selected rank
16 of 27
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

3 shared references · rank 17 of 27

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.031
Jaccard
0.016
Selected rank
17 of 27
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

3 shared references · rank 18 of 27

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.030
Jaccard
0.015
Selected rank
18 of 27
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

2 shared references · rank 19 of 27

Shared references
2
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.034
Jaccard
0.015
Selected rank
19 of 27
Performance Information Use in Local Government: Monitoring Relationships with Emergency Medical Services Agencies Alexander C. Henderson, Daniel E. Bromberg · 2015

2 shared references · rank 20 of 27

Shared references
2
This record reference degree
106
Neighbor reference degree
38
Cosine
0.032
Jaccard
0.014
Selected rank
20 of 27

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

No exported neighbor met this bounded co-citation selection.

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.