2019 Foundations

Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services

Roger Pfiffner

Public Performance & Management Review

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 2
References in snapshot: 2
Global cited by: 8

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 2

The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020

References 2

Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

16 shared references · rank 1 of 29

Shared references
16
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.205
Jaccard
0.111
Selected rank
1 of 29
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

14 shared references · rank 2 of 29

Shared references
14
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.185
Jaccard
0.100
Selected rank
2 of 29
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

12 shared references · rank 3 of 29

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.166
Jaccard
0.090
Selected rank
3 of 29
Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang · 2026

10 shared references · rank 4 of 29

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
104
Cosine
0.125
Jaccard
0.064
Selected rank
4 of 29
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

9 shared references · rank 5 of 29

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.142
Jaccard
0.076
Selected rank
5 of 29
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

9 shared references · rank 6 of 29

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.134
Jaccard
0.071
Selected rank
6 of 29
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

9 shared references · rank 7 of 29

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.133
Jaccard
0.071
Selected rank
7 of 29
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020

8 shared references · rank 8 of 29

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
50
Cosine
0.144
Jaccard
0.077
Selected rank
8 of 29
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

7 shared references · rank 9 of 29

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.092
Jaccard
0.047
Selected rank
9 of 29
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

6 shared references · rank 10 of 29

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.107
Jaccard
0.056
Selected rank
10 of 29
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

6 shared references · rank 11 of 29

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.103
Jaccard
0.054
Selected rank
11 of 29
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

6 shared references · rank 12 of 29

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.082
Jaccard
0.042
Selected rank
12 of 29
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

6 shared references · rank 13 of 29

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.082
Jaccard
0.042
Selected rank
13 of 29
Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016

6 shared references · rank 14 of 29

Shared references
6
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
88
Cosine
0.081
Jaccard
0.042
Selected rank
14 of 29
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

5 shared references · rank 15 of 29

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.098
Jaccard
0.051
Selected rank
15 of 29
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

5 shared references · rank 16 of 29

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.086
Jaccard
0.045
Selected rank
16 of 29
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019

5 shared references · rank 17 of 29

Shared references
5
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
78
Cosine
0.072
Jaccard
0.037
Selected rank
17 of 29
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

4 shared references · rank 18 of 29

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.088
Jaccard
0.044
Selected rank
18 of 29
Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use Jakob Majlund Holm · 2017

4 shared references · rank 19 of 29

Shared references
4
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
60
Cosine
0.066
Jaccard
0.034
Selected rank
19 of 29
The Use of Performance Information under Conflict: A Large-N Study Peter Dahler‐Larsen · 2021

3 shared references · rank 20 of 29

Shared references
3
This record reference degree
62
Neighbor reference degree
36
Cosine
0.064
Jaccard
0.032
Selected rank
20 of 29

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

2 shared citing records · rank 1 of 2

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
2
Neighbor citer degree
4
Cosine
0.707
Jaccard
0.500
Selected rank
1 of 2
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

2 shared citing records · rank 2 of 2

Shared citing records
2
This record citer degree
2
Neighbor citer degree
16
Cosine
0.354
Jaccard
0.125
Selected rank
2 of 2

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.