2026 Foundations

Factors shaping the use of performance information by public managers

Denita Cepiku, Marco Mastrodascio, Weijie Wang

Public Management Review

Metadata only

Open public record

Generic document type; no canonical identity or publication type is inferred.

Cited by in snapshot: 0
References in snapshot: 9
Global cited by: 9

Within this provisional snapshot

Direct citation relationships

Arrows follow the source-record relationship: a reference is an outgoing edge; “cited by” is an incoming edge. This does not adjudicate canonical work identity.

Cited by 0

No incoming citation from another provisional record in this snapshot.

References 9

Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012
Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020
Negative media reporting and its effects on performance information use in public spending David Lindermüller, Matthias Sohn, Bernhard Hirsch · 2021
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

Show 1 more referenced records

Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

Bounded connected-literature evidence

Why these records are nearby

These are aggregate discovery relationships, not direct citations, identity decisions, recommendations, or a complete neighborhood. Ranks and metrics come unchanged from the engine’s public projection.

Bibliographic coupling

Records that cite some of the same reference targets.

Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research Alexander Kroll · 2015

29 shared references · rank 1 of 46

Shared references
29
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
92
Cosine
0.296
Jaccard
0.174
Selected rank
1 of 46
Understanding diverse types of performance information use: evidence from an institutional isomorphism perspective Yujin Choi, Harin Woo · 2022

25 shared references · rank 2 of 46

Shared references
25
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
65
Cosine
0.304
Jaccard
0.174
Selected rank
2 of 46
Why Performance Information Use Varies Among Public Managers: Testing Manager-Related Explanations Alexander Kroll · 2014

24 shared references · rank 3 of 46

Shared references
24
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
98
Cosine
0.238
Jaccard
0.135
Selected rank
3 of 46
Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations Åge Johnsen, Kerstin Solholm, Per Arne Tufte · 2024

19 shared references · rank 4 of 46

Shared references
19
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
94
Cosine
0.192
Jaccard
0.106
Selected rank
4 of 46
What Gets Measured Gets Managed? The Use of Performance Information across Organizational Echelons in the Public Sector Caroline Howard Grøn, Mads Bøge Kristiansen · 2022

17 shared references · rank 5 of 46

Shared references
17
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
84
Cosine
0.182
Jaccard
0.099
Selected rank
5 of 46
Managing for Results Differently: Examining Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use in Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu · 2018

16 shared references · rank 6 of 46

Shared references
16
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
74
Cosine
0.182
Jaccard
0.099
Selected rank
6 of 46
The Effects of Managers’ Purposeful Performance Information Use on American Hospital Performance Taehee Kim, Morgen Johansen, Ling Zhu · 2020

15 shared references · rank 7 of 46

Shared references
15
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
73
Cosine
0.172
Jaccard
0.093
Selected rank
7 of 46
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART Donald P. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu · 2012

12 shared references · rank 8 of 46

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
33
Cosine
0.205
Jaccard
0.096
Selected rank
8 of 46
Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach Alexander Kroll · 2015

12 shared references · rank 9 of 46

Shared references
12
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.127
Jaccard
0.067
Selected rank
9 of 46
Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities Giuseppe Grossi, Christoph Reichard, Pasquale Ruggiero · 2016

11 shared references · rank 10 of 46

Shared references
11
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
88
Cosine
0.115
Jaccard
0.061
Selected rank
10 of 46
Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Vid Štimac · 2013

10 shared references · rank 11 of 46

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
42
Cosine
0.151
Jaccard
0.074
Selected rank
11 of 46
Why Performance Information Use Requires a Managerial Identity: Evidence from the Field of Human Services Roger Pfiffner · 2019

10 shared references · rank 12 of 46

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
62
Cosine
0.125
Jaccard
0.064
Selected rank
12 of 46
A Behavioral Model of Public Organizations: Bounded Rationality, Performance Feedback, and Negativity Bias Sounman Hong · 2018

10 shared references · rank 13 of 46

Shared references
10
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
86
Cosine
0.106
Jaccard
0.056
Selected rank
13 of 46
What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations Pietro Micheli, Andrey Pavlov · 2017

9 shared references · rank 14 of 46

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.119
Jaccard
0.060
Selected rank
14 of 46
Promoting Performance Information Use Through Data Visualization: Evidence from an Experiment Andrew Ballard · 2019

9 shared references · rank 15 of 46

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
78
Cosine
0.100
Jaccard
0.052
Selected rank
15 of 46
Manager and employee behaviors in response to performance signals in public organizations Taek Kyu Kim · 2023

9 shared references · rank 16 of 46

Shared references
9
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
201
Cosine
0.062
Jaccard
0.030
Selected rank
16 of 46
LEARNING FROM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, ASPIRATION LEVELS, AND MANAGERIAL PRIORITIES Poul Aaes Nielsen · 2013

8 shared references · rank 17 of 46

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
51
Cosine
0.110
Jaccard
0.054
Selected rank
17 of 46
Does Fiscal Austerity Affect Political Decision-Makers’ Use and Perception of Performance Information? Bente Bjørnholt, Martin Bækgaard, Kurt Houlberg · 2016

8 shared references · rank 18 of 46

Shared references
8
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
54
Cosine
0.107
Jaccard
0.053
Selected rank
18 of 46
Performance Information Use under Financial Stress: How Do Public, Nonprofit, and Private Organizations Differ? Roger Pfiffner, Adrian Ritz, Gene A. Brewer · 2020

7 shared references · rank 19 of 46

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
50
Cosine
0.097
Jaccard
0.048
Selected rank
19 of 46
Does Trust in the Performance Measurement Organization Influence How Public Managers Use Performance Information? Hongchun Zhang, Steven Van de Walle, Yue Zhuo · 2016

7 shared references · rank 20 of 46

Shared references
7
This record reference degree
104
Neighbor reference degree
55
Cosine
0.093
Jaccard
0.046
Selected rank
20 of 46

Co-citation

Records cited together by the same public-snapshot records.

No exported neighbor met this bounded co-citation selection.

Rows require at least 2 shared references or shared citing records, as applicable, and are capped at 20 neighbors per record and relation type. See definitions, ranking, and limits.